This briefing paper considers the existing building control regime and customers’ means of redress when faced with defects in newly built housing. It summarises the findings of the All-Party Parliamentary Group's 2016 inquiry and recommended actions and explains the Government and industry response.Jump to full report >>
A good deal of political attention is focused on the need to increase the rate of house building, but alongside this are growing concerns about the quality of the houses under development. MPs are encountering constituents who have bought new homes and who are struggling to achieve satisfactory resolution when defects are reported to builders. The role of building control officers in ensuring compliance with the building regulations has been the subject of two Westminster Hall debates, one in 2015 and another in 2016. A Westminster Hall debate on 16 October 2017 focused on issues with warranties issued by the National House-Buidling Council (NHBC). There are some high profile examples of some recently completed blocks facing demolition due to serious construction defects, for example, Solomon’s Passage in Southwark which was built in 2010.
In this context, the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for Excellence in the Built Environment carried out an open inquiry into the quality and workmanship of new housing for sale in England and published its report, More Homes, Fewer Complaints, in July 2016.
The APPG identified a risk around efforts to incentivise house building for homeownership if similar attention is not directed at ensuring consumers are buying “new homes that are fit for purpose, are of enduring quality, perform to the requisite levels of maintenance, cost and energy efficiency and give peace of mind, pride and enjoyment to those who occupy them.”
More Homes, Fewer Complaints contains a number of recommendations aimed at:
Taken together, the APPG felt that the recommendations would address the imbalance identified in the bargaining positions of builders and house-buyers.
This is not the first time that the standard of newly built housing has come under scrutiny. The Callcutt Review of Housebuilding Delivery (2007) noted concerns around caveats included within warranties provided on new homes. It was felt that they might not offer adequate protection for consumers. The Office of Fair Trading’s 2008 study of the homebuilding market also considered the effectiveness of warranties. One response was to recommend the introduction of a code of conduct to address the consumer protection concerns. The industry responded with a Consumer Code for Homebuilders, now in its fourth edition. However, the APPG concluded that the code “does not appear to give homebuyers the safeguards we think they should expect.”
The former Housing Minister, Alok Sharma, responded to the Westminster Hall debate on 16 October 2017 saying “it is clear that home builders need to step up and make quality and design a priority. That includes ensuring that, where something goes wrong, house builders and warranty providers fulfil their obligations to put things right.” He described the following actions which are underway:
Subsequently, on 29 November 2017 Sajid Javid, then Secretary of State at DCLG, told a group of housing professionals that it was vital that the quality of new build homes continues to improve. He said that the Government would consult in 2018 and “look at options to explore how the overlap between responsibilities can be improved. This would help to avoid the confusion faced by consumers over where to seek help.” Strengthening consumer redress in the housing market: a consultation ran between 18 February and 16 April 2018. Responses are currently being analysed. The APPG published Better redress for home buyers in June 2018 which focuses on how a New Homes Ombudsman could drive up standards and improve consumer redress.
In June 2017 the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) set up a Commission of Past Presidents to consider construction quality standards following the closure of 17 schools in Edinburgh earlier in the year. The fire at Grenfell Tower prompted the Commission to launch a call for evidence in October 2017. The Chair of the Commission, Paul Nash, referred to the tragic events at Grenfell underlining “the need for an urgent review of the way in which quality is managed in our industry.” Evidence could be submitted up to 15 December 2017. 75% of the 200 construction industry respondents to the call for evidence reportedly believe that “the industry’s current management of quality is inadequate.”
Commons Briefing papers CBP-7665
Author: Wendy Wilson