The Family Test was introduced in 2014 in England. All new domestic laws and government policies must apply the Family Test to make sure they support strong and stable families. The DWP has published departmental advice on conducting the Family Test. It is not a statutory requirement; publishing the results of the Test is encouraged but not required.Jump to full report >>
David Cameron announced the introduction of the Family Test in a speech in August 2014:
I said previously that I wanted to introduce a family test into government. Now that test is being formalised as part of the impact assessment for all domestic policies. Put simply that means every single domestic policy that government comes up with will be examined for its impact on the family.
In October 2014, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) published guidance on implementing the Family Test. The Test consists of five questions that policy makers need to consider:
The application of the Family Test must be documented. The guidance asks Departments to consider publishing the outcomes but it is not a requirement.
MPs have asked numerous Parliamentary Questions about how the Test is being implemented, how many assessments have been carried out, and whether assessments will be published.
In March 2016 Implementing the Family Test: A review of progress one year on was published by The Family and Childcare Trust, Relate, and Relationship Foundation supported by 14 other charities. The organisations had written to 14 relevant Government Departments asking about the guidance issued on implementing the Family Test and assessments carried out or published since its introduction. The report reproduced the responses and questioned the commitment of some Departments to implementing the Test.
There have been calls from some MPs, the Centre for Social Justice, and the Relationship Alliance, to make the Family Test a statutory requirement. This was the intention of Caroline Ansell’s Private Member’s Bill (PMB) which was introduced during the 2015-16 Parliamentary Session. The Government resisted these calls, arguing that it would reduce the Test to a tick box exercise. Priti Patel, then Minister for Employment, set out the Government position during the Second Reading debate on Caroline Ansell’s PMB:
Placing the family test on a legislative footing, however, runs the risk of turning the test into a tick-box exercise across Government Departments, when our ambition is to work across government with Departments to embed the benefits of thinking about policy from a family perspective at all stages of policy development, not just complying with legislative requirements.
Commons Briefing papers CBP-7714
Authors: Laura Abreu; Alexander Bellis