Efforts by the Home Office to remedy the injustices suffered by people caught up in the Windrush scandal are ongoing. The Windrush compensation scheme has recently begun to issue award offers, and legislation underpinning the scheme has been introduced for the 2019-20 session. Some stakeholders remain dissatisfied with aspects of the Government's response to the scandal.Jump to full report >>
In late 2017 The Guardian newspaper began reporting stories of longstanding UK residents who were being wrongly classed as illegal immigrants and consequently, denied access to employment, healthcare and other services in the UK and targeted for removal.
The obstacles these individuals encountered trying to prove their status, and the dire implications for their lives in the UK, have come to be referred to as the ‘Windrush scandal’.
The overall number of people affected isn’t known. Attention initially focussed on people from Caribbean Commonwealth countries, particularly ‘Windrush children’ - people who came to the UK as children to join family members who had migrated post-WW2. But people from other countries have also been involved.
Whilst the Immigration Act 1971 provided that foreign nationals who were ‘ordinarily resident’ in the UK on 1 January 1973 (when the Act came into force) were deemed to have ‘settled’ status (i.e. Indefinite Leave to Remain), in practice many people have been living in the UK for decades without documentary proof of their immigration/nationality status.
This has become increasingly problematic for individuals as laws to detect and discourage illegal immigration have proliferated, particularly following the introduction of ‘hostile’ (also known as ‘compliant’) environment policies since 2010. These policies were aimed at tackling illegal immigration, by making it harder for people without legal status to access services and live undetected in the UK. But in practice some people who were lawfully resident in the UK but didn’t have documentary proof of their rights also became affected by the measures and found themselves denied healthcare, welfare benefits, pensions, housing and jobs.
In theory they could resolve their difficulties by applying to the Home Office for confirmation of their status. However, issues such as the significant application fee, and the amount of supporting evidence required by the Home Office, posed additional practical obstacles for some people.
The Home Office has acknowledged that it lost sight of this cohort of cases when designing and implementing broader immigration policies. Successive Home Secretaries have apologised for the “appalling” treatment that individuals have experienced, and vowed to put right the injustices that people affected by the scandal have suffered.
Under pressure to recognise the significance of the problem, in April 2018 the Home Office announced some measures it was taking to address the Windrush generation’s situation. These included:
Most of these workstreams are still in progress.
The time-limited compensation scheme was launched in April 2019. All claims received on or before 2 April 2021 will be considered by the Home Office. There is a six-month grace period (until 2 October 2021) for claims received after that date. But this will only cater for claims considered by the Home Office to involve exceptional circumstances.
The Windrush Compensation Scheme (Expenditure) Bill was introduced to the House on 8 January 2020. Its purpose is to give Parliamentary authorisation for expenditure under the scheme.
The Government’s response to the Windrush scandal continues to be controversial.
Stakeholders have complained of delays in resolving cases referred to the Taskforce and in establishing the compensation scheme and an interim hardship fund. In a couple of cases people have died before their cases and claims for compensation were resolved.
Although there was an extensive consultation on the design of the compensation scheme, the final arrangements have been heavily criticised. Objections have been raised against the restrictions on the types of losses that individuals can claim for, and the limits on the amount of compensation that can be awarded for certain categories of loss. The Opposition has also objected to the arrangements for reviewing compensation offers as insufficient.
The Home Office’s role in the Windrush scandal and the adequacy of its response has been heavily criticised by the National Audit Office, and several parliamentary Committees.
The ‘Windrush Lessons Learned Review’, which is being led by Wendy Williams, HM Inspector of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services, has not yet been published but is expected imminently.
Observers have identified other groups of people living in the UK who are facing similar difficulties in securing or documenting their status, or might do in the future, as a result of Home Office policy and practice. Specific concerns have been raised about people living in the UK with rights under EU law, undocumented children, and Chagos Islanders. The Home Office has rejected the comparisons.